Students Learning Style On Products Pastry And Bakery Learning
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The research background from observations through the results of initial observations and interviews conducted at SMK N 6 with product pastry and bakery teacher it is known that there are still many who neglect assignments and do not understand theory well so that the value of the theory they get is very low and does not reach the KKM. The reaserach purpose is describe of students learning style on product pastry and bakery learning. This type of research is descriptive research with a quantitative approach. The population of this study were all culinary students of class XII at SMKN 6 Padang who had completed learning pastry and bakery products in class XI, totaling 94 people. The sampling technique uses a saturated sampling technique so that all populations become samples. Data collection techniques were carried out using a questionnaire with a guttman scale that has been tested for validity and reliability. Furthermore, the data were analyzed through descriptive analysis with the method of categorizing the assessment based on the average score and the percentage of the assessment. The results of the study concluded that the Learning Styles of Students in Pastry and Bakery Product Learning at SMKN 6 Padang found that the average visual learning style was 39.70% of students belonging to the low category, then the auditory learning style was 34.95% of students belonging to the low category, and the learning style kinesthetic learning is 25.35% of students belonging to the low category. This means that there are no students who 100% have only one learning style, but various. So it can be concluded that the most dominant learning style possessed by class XII students of culinary competence in learning pastry and bakery products at SMK N 6 Padang is a visual learning style.
Keywords
References
Arikunto, S. 2010a. Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
_________. 2014b. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Ahyar, Hardani et al. 2020. Buku Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif.
Bajga, Wahyu Sulfemi dan Abdul Qodir (Eds.). 2017. Hubungan Kurikulum 2013 Dengan Motivasi Belajar Pesera Didik Di SMK Pelita Ciampe. Bogor: STKIP Muhammadiyah Bogor.
Chaniya, Yen, dkk. 2020. Hubungan Gaya Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Biologi Kelas X SMA 2 Sungai Tarab Kabupaten Tanah Datar. Jurnal Of Sainstek, 8(1): 77-84.
DePorte, Bobby dan Mike Hernacki. 2013. Quantum Learning: Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Bandung: Kaifa Learning
Fauhah, Homroul. 2021. Analisis Model Pembelajaran Make A Match terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP), 09(02)
Gunawan, Adi W. 2006. Genius Learning Strategi. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama.
Indrawan, Irjus. 2021a. Transformasi Digital dan Gaya Belajar. Purwokerto: Pena Persada.
_____________. 2021b. Pembelajaran Di Era New Normal. Purwokerto: Pena Persada
Kalprianus, Jeffrit Ismail. 2012. Pengantar Metodologi Pembelajaran PAK. Wamena: STT Arastamar Wamena
Kemedikbud. 2020. Keputusan Bersama Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Menteri Agama dan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indoneisa Tentang Panduan Penyelenggaraan Pembelajaran Pada Tahun Ajaran 2020/2021 di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. https://youtu.be/zCQpvy3z2ew.
Kurniawan, A. W., & Puspitaningtyas, Z. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Pandiva Buku.
Machmudah, Umi dan Wahab, Abdul Rosyidi. 2008. Active Learning dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Malang: 2008.
Marlina, Leni dan Sholehun. 2021. “Analisis Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Hasil Belajar Bahasa Indonesia Pada Siswa Kelas IV SD Muhammadiyah Majaran Kabupaten Sorong”. Universitas Pendidikan Muhammadiyah Sorong. 2 (1): 66.
Marpaung, J. 2016. Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Kopasta: Jurnal Program Studi Bimbingan Konseling, 2(2).
Munif Chatib. 2011. Sekolahnya Manusia (Sekolah Berbasis Multiple Intelligences di Indonesia). Bandung: Kaifa PT Mizan Pustaka.
Nasution. 2009. Berbagai Pendidikan dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Pt. Bumi Aksara.
Purnomo, Halim. 2019. Psikologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Penelitian, Publikasi, dan Pengabdian Masayarakat (LP3M).
Priyatno. 2010. 5 jam Belajar Olah Data dengan SPSS 19. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Raihan. 2017. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Universitas Islam Jakarta.
Riduwan. 2012a. Metode & Teknik Menyusun Proposal Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
_______. 2004b. Metode Riset. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Samsu. 2017. Metode Penelitian. Jambi: Pusaka Jambi.
Sedana, Gege Suci, dkk. 2020. Transformasi Digital dan Gaya Belajar. Purwokerto: Pena Persada.
Sugiyono. 2019a. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
________. 2016b. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
________. 2010c. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
________.2007d. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Shielded Metal Arc Welding ( Smaw ) Welding Learning Media For Vocational High Schools Students. 8(2), 17–24.
Siyoto, Sandu dan Sodik, Ali. 2015. Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Kediri: Literasi Media Publishing.
Susilo, M. Joko. 2006. Gaya Belajar Menjadikan Makin Pintar. Yogyakarta: Pinus.
Syarifuddin, A. 2011. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Cooperative Belajar dan Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Ta’dib: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 16(01).
Widhi, Agung Kurniawan dan Purbaningtyas, Zarah. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Pandiva Buku.
Zakiatul, Risa Hasanah. 2021. Gaya Belajar. Malang: Lietarsi Nusantara
DOI: 10.24036/jptbt.v4i1.6316
Article Metrics
Abstract View : 209 times; PDF : 42 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Adella Putri Baravanni

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.