The Relation How To Learn With The Learning Outcomes Indonesian Cake Of Tata Boga

Puput Nova(1), Elida Elida(2*),

(1) Universitas Negeri Padang
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang
(*) Corresponding Author




Abstract

One of the factors that influence student learning outcomes is the way students learn. This study aims to describe the relationship between learning methods and student learning outcomes in the subject of Indonesian Cake and Cake Products at SMK Negeri 1 Padang Panjang. The method used in this research is quantitative methods which are classified into correlational research types. The population in this study was the students of class XI Food Management at SMK Negeri 1 Padang Panjang. The sample technique used was total sampling. Student learning data were obtained from distributing questionnaires which were arranged using a Likert scale model. While learning outcomes are obtained from the final report card grades. The data analysis technique used in this research is Product Moment Correlation. Based on the results of the research conducted, it was shown that the students' learning method in the subject of Indonesian cake and cake products, the Culinary Skills Competency of SMK Negeri 1 Padang Panjang was in the good category with a percentage of 76% and learning outcomes were”in the good category with a percentage of”52% with a correlation coefficient of 0.406 significance 0.02 <”0.05”or” t count> t table”(2.307> 1.699) shows that the hypothesis (Ha) is accepted, namely that”there is a positive and significant relationship between learning”methods and learning”outcomes in Indonesian Cake and Cake Products Subjects Competency of Culinary Skills at SMK Negeri 1 Padang Panjang.

 


Keywords

Learning Method; Learning Outcomes

References

Asep Jihad. 2012.Evaluasi Pembelajaran cet.1. Yogyakarta: Multi Pressindo.

Aunurrahman. 2012. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Bobbi Deporter & Mike Hernacki. 2001. Quantum Learning Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Bandung : PT. Mizan Publika

Buku Panduan Penulisan Tugas Akhir/Skripsi. 2016. Padang: Universitas Negeri Padang.

Daryanto. 2010. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Dimyati dan Mudjiono. 2006. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Gie, The Liang. 1995. Cara Belajar yang Efisien. Yogyakarta : L. Berty.

Kurikulum. 2013. Padang Panjang : Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Negeri 1

Kurikulum. 2013. Padang Panjang : Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Negeri 1

Nana Sudjana. 2009. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja.

Nasution, Jamilah Aini., Alizamar., & N. (2017). Motif Siswa Memiliki Smartphone dan Penggunaannya. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia, 3(2), 15–29.

Oemar Hamalik. 1983. Metode Belajar dan Kesulitan-kesulitan Belajar. Bandung: Tarsito.

Purwanto, 2011. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Purwanto, M.Ngalim. 2013. Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung : Remaja Rosda Karya.

Riduwan, 2007. Skala Pengukuran Variabel-variabel Penelitian. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Rohati, R., Elida, E., & Syarif, W. (2014). Hubungan Cara Belajar Dengan Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Prodi Pkk Konsentrasi Tata Boga Jurusan Kesejahteraan Keluarga Fakultas Teknik UNP. E-Journal Home Economic and Tourism, 5(1).

Slameto. 1995. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Cet II. Jakarta : PT. Rineka Cipta.

Sugiyono, 2010. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono, 2010. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Suharsimi, Arikunto,2010. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta:PT. Rineka Cipta.

Yusuf A. M. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian (Dasar-Dasar Penyelidikan Ilmiah). Padang: UNP Press.


Full Text: ; PDF

DOI: 10.24036/jptbt.v2i1.87
10.24036/jptbt.v2i1.87

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 214 times
; PDF : 77 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Puput Nova

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.